patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

University City School Board Members Get Tough Love Talk

University City School Board told its needs to narrow its focus as it works to maintain full accreditation.

 

Tough talk from the staff of the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) at Thursday night's University City School Board meeting.

"You're going to have to focus" on the areas you think are important, said Robert Taylor, DESE Area Supervisor.  He said the University City school district has a superior comprehensive school improvement plan, but it is very large. "To have the resources to do everything that they want to do is not being realistic," he said.

As it stands, the District remains fully accredited, but if it were to undergo a review at this stage it would not meet the state’s academic standards. 

Taylor gave an update on U. City's school improvement plan and accreditation status.  "This school district is a good school district and I would like to see that you continue that way," he said. "But the issue will be, do you have a plan? Do you work the plan? Or do you wander all over the place?"

Taylor put the pressure for progress squarely on Superintendent Joylynn Wilson Pruitt. "That's the reason she gets paid the big bucks."  He said it's important that the board work together and not micro-manage the superintendent. "Her job (Superintendent Pruitt) is to take what you want to get done and let her do it."

Taylor said the school board will have to narrow down the things it really cares about. "University City has a good plan. They're working the plan. We'll see this coming year on how they hit their targets." 

School Board President Tom Peters commended the board for its hard work. "I think we have made some progress." He said the board has had some very tough conversations about having realistic expectations in respect to the administration,  teachers and students. 

Related Topics: Board of Education, School Board Meeting, School Board Members, and u city
Your reaction to the accreditation status update? Tell us in the comments.

Cindy

8:06 am on Friday, February 18, 2011

It is important to note that school districts only need to meet 9 of the 14 accreditation points. Reading, "U City has seven accreditation points out of 14 points" one might infer that the district needs all 14 points to stay accredited when only 9 points are required. Even neighboring Clayton does not have all 14 points.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Myra Lopez

9:33 am on Friday, February 18, 2011

Cindy, thanks for your comments. I've removed the sentence concerning the accreditation points because it stemmed from confusion over a statement made last night by Board Member Maria Chappelle-Nadal. She stated "For the last four years we've been at 7, which is equivalent to a provisional accreditation." Communications Director said Linda Russell, "The District's current seven APR points do not mean provisional accreditation. Only if the state conducted a review right now could those seven points result in a change to our accreditation status, and the state is not conducting a review of University City," right now.

Holston Black Jr.

2:44 pm on Friday, February 18, 2011

I have been attending school board meetings and have only heard the term provisionally accredited, not full. I guess it's like the term " is the glass half full or half empty" either way the school district is in serious trouble. There was one glimmer of hope academically, last night, three Caucasian students were recognized as becoming national merit finalists. This district is still trying to justify what a colleague of mine calls " the top of the bottom".

Reply

Maggie Stanley Majors

1:23 am on Saturday, February 19, 2011

Thank you for these reports and comments on important meetings around town!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Myra Lopez

9:12 am on Saturday, February 19, 2011

Thanks for your comments Maggie. There are very important things happening in U City concerning the budget and schools.

Leave a comment