patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Park Commission Members Frustrated at Lack of Involvement Over Some U City Issues

Park Commission members have approved three motions they hope will send the message that the group does not want to be left out of talks on major projects.

 

Members of the park commission expressed frustration at Tuesday night's meeting that they have not been consulted on big issues that are impacting University City residents.

The group said it was left out of the loop on construction going on at Ackert Park Walkway. A statue of Chuck Berry is slated to go into the plaza area next to Fitz's Soda Bar & Grille, the area used to house the Ackert Plaza Arch. That was torn down. However, no one on the park commission nor the city council knows who green-lighted that action.

“Our parks are named for mayors--Chuck Berry is not even a resident of University City," commission member Caryn St. Clair said.

Councilmember Lynn Ricci, who is council liaison to the park commission, said to her knowledge, the Berry statue was approved at a November 2010 Arts and Letters Commission meeting. She said the vote on the statue was not on the agenda, but appears in the minutes of the meeting. It did not go to the parks commission.

Ricci said the statue is technically not going into a park but in a University City right-of-way.

"I'm embarrassed to tell people, gee, I don't know. I don’t know why we did that," Park Commission President John Sweeney said. "If I'm going to have this job as a park commissioner, I want to be able to tell people I know what is going on," he said. "So, I'm fixing my problem."

Members of the park commission voted unanimously on a motion to recommend that construction on Ackert Walk be halted until design and development plans are brought before parks for review and recommendations to the council.

Park members also expressed disapproval that they were not consulted about the fate of the lights at the Ruth Park Driving Range, which City Manager Lehman Walker recently decided should be permanently turned off.

"If we're just a paper tiger, then we don't need to be here," Sweeney said. "I think it's insulting that we have been bypassed for some of these things," member Karen Dille said.

In a unanimous vote, park members approved a motion to recommend reopening the driving range lights issue for review and recommendation to the city council.

Earlier this month, City Manager Lehman Walker decided to keep the lights off, and told University City Patch "It was in the best interest of the residents who live across the street." Before the policy change, the range lights would stay on until 9:30 p.m., weather permitting.

A committee of driving range neighbors and golf enthusiast was formed at Walker's insistence to look at complaints about the range and make recommendations. A permanent shutdown of the lights was not among the suggestions sent to him. 

Park  member William Field was part of the driving range committee, but his role was as a resident not a board member.

Park members also approved a motion that all future park-related issues be brought before the Park Commission for review and recommendation per the city charter.

The three recommendations will now go to the City Council.

The board members hope the recommendations will spur council to look more closely into what is happening in University City.

We're making sure that "our City Council knows that we're hearing from citizens that we're not doing everything we should do and it's time to step up and do that," Sweeney said.

Tracy

8:17 am on Wednesday, May 25, 2011

I'm disappointed that the lights are not on in the evenings at Ruth Park. We spend several hundred dollars a year at the driving range and I wish our money could stay in U City. Instead we've had to head west to the Creve Coeur area.

Reply

Craig Brown

9:47 am on Wednesday, May 25, 2011

The Mayor, City Manager and City Council have no idea whats going on in this city! Fail, Fail, Fail. Thats all we hear about! Was the "chuck Berry park" really necessary during a time of this cities fiscal collapse/mismanagement? How about the massively expensive parking a lot on the southwest end of the Delmar loop? WTF! Brick wall, pavers, wrought iron.....And all for about 20 cars??? Who thought that was a good idea???? THINK THINK THINK
You're running good people out of this town.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kim

9:07 pm on Wednesday, May 25, 2011

Re. the parking lot: the asphalt surface was replaced with interlocking bricks for two primary reasons. The first is environmental. Similar to the lot at the Botanical Gardens, the interlocking bricks allow the water to be absorbed and not create run-off. That is going to be an ongoing issue for the city as they repair/replace parking lots. Secondly, the interlocking brick structure suppossedly requires less maintenance than asphalt. (I think we will all find out soon enough if that is correct.)

Tom Payne

2:37 pm on Wednesday, May 25, 2011

What I don't understand is why the good citizens of University City are not as fed up as the members of the Parks Commission with "municipal management by imperial decree". Elected officials are there because we put them there. Exactly how much of this is enoough?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lisa Hummel

9:02 pm on Sunday, May 29, 2011

Some of us are getting that fed up, and the more we learn, the more we're feeling that way. Kudos to the parks commission for speaking up about this. Let your friends and neighbors know when you hear of this kind of municipal nonsense going on so that they can speak up too.

Gloria Nickerson

8:37 am on Friday, May 27, 2011

Total disrespect............were there any options considered?
1. In the Spring and Summer lights off at 9:00
2. In the Fall and Winter lights off at 7:00, weather permitting

Are there any statistical data that shows we have had to increase Police pagtrol in this area? How many tickets have been issued since the lights were installed? How many households have complained?

I drove by this cousre daily for years and saw this as progress for the City. The lights being on period....should be considered as an additional safety measure. Again, a single person makes a decision that affects an entire community. Has anyone within U. City government contacted the school board to see if they would agree for Ruth Park guest to park at the Board of Education or Brittany Woods after hours? Perhaps we will have to spend our money at the course on Pritchard Farm Road or Forest Park....everyone is competing for golfer's business, they may even work out a deal if there is three or more....just a thought. So sad for U. City and those who chose to use our golf course at Ruth Park.

Reply

Jen Jensen

10:00 am on Friday, May 27, 2011

Concerning Ackert Plaza and Ackert Walkway: This has been park land since its dedication in1967. Hasn't the Park Department maintained it all these years? Therefore - this is park land paid for by U.City Urban Renewal Bond Issue 1962.
from Elsie Beck Glickert

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kim

10:15 am on Friday, May 27, 2011

It has been looking pretty shabby in recent years, so I'm glad to see it get a facelift. But, I too am surprised that the Parks Dept. wasn't involved in the process. I hope that work that was started can be continued soon, otherwise it will be an eyesore all summer.

Leave a comment