Council Again Postpones Vote on Money for New U City Firehouse
Councilmembers once again delayed voting on funding for an additional firehouse in University City, saying they wanted a study session.
For a second time this month, the city council has postponed a vote on approving additional funding for a new firehouse in University City.
"I don’t feel comfortable voting on this," said Councilmember L. Michael Glickert at Monday night's city council meeting. "There are just too many unknowns." Several councilmembers voiced their support for a study session on the issue.
"Staff will arrange a study session as soon as possible," City Manager Lehman Walker said.
The vote to delay followed comment by several residents who opposed allocating the additional money for the firehouse, which is to be built on Vernon and Westgate avenues.
Gregory Pace urged the council to not fund a fire station that "We don’t need."
Elsie Glickert took issue with the proposed location of the fire station at Vernon and Westgate. She said the area floods repeatedly.
"This is not the right location for a fire station. It is a natural river," said Glickert. "Just because the previous administration made an error in judgment, do not have this on your conscience. Please, do not vote out money for this mistake," she said.
The proposed new firehouse would replace Engine House No. 1, currently located at 6801 Delmar Blvd.
At the last meeting on Sept. 12, councilmembers also delayed voting on whether to allocate additional money for the firehouse, saying the issue needed more study.
University City received a grant in the amount of $2,612,197 for constructing the new firehouse. That was $536,981 less than originally requested. Now, the fire department is requesting additional funding from the city in the amount of $674,494 to complete the project, as the current construction costs exceed the amount the city has allotted for the project.
City staff has recommended approving the additional firehouse funds—saying the money should come out of city reserves.
Joe Clooney
8:33 am on Thursday, September 29, 2011
I think WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY should pay for the remaining funding.
Cindy Thierry
8:54 am on Thursday, September 29, 2011
Not that your idea shouldn't be explored, but why should Wash U pay when it was the city manager that forgot to include almost $700,000 for the firehouse in the budget? Shouldn't Mr. Walker have budgeted appropriately?
The city manager and mayor told residents they created a surplus budget. Then they started spending the so called surplus (like $100,000 for PR and hiring for positions that were previously "eliminated") and now the city has a deficit budget and they want to draw from reserves.
Joe Clooney
10:45 am on Thursday, September 29, 2011
Wash U. is trading land with U.City, the area is Wash U. property the don't pay taxes
so maybe they would pay the remaining amount. I agree with Mrs. Glickert the land is over the sewer tunnel and is always settling at that intersection.