City Manager Hopes For Compromise on Range Lights; Awaiting Recommendations From Landscape Architect
University City has hired a landscape architect to look at the driving range lights issue and hopefully come up with a compromise.
City Manager Lehman Walker said he inherited the issue of the Ruth Park driving range lights and is doing his best to find a compromise.
At Tuesday’s park commission meeting, Walker took questions from the commissioners concerning his decision in May to permanently turn off the range lights after neighbors across the street from the range complained of light spillage into their homes.
"I believe the lights are problematic," Walker told the commissioners. "It's a problem I inherited. It's a problem I'm making every effort to address."
Walker said University City has hired the landscape architect firm Austin Tao & Associates to look at the lighting issue and make some recommendations to the city. The architect is expected to give his opinion on the lights in a month or two. Walker said he doesn’t want to make any decisions on the lights until he hears back from the architect.
"I made the decision to turn the lights off until we come to some kind of decision based upon a proper study," he said.
The commissioners said since the study won’t be back until November, it’s doubtful anything will be done about the lights until next golf season.
When asked if the lights could remain on during the study period, Walker responded, “I prefer not to do that.”
“I’m waiting to get recommendation from a professional landscape architect on how to solve this problem,” he said. “I hope to bring closure to this soon."
Walker defended his decision to turn the lights off, even though they only bother a handful of neighbors.
“I believe residents across the street should have more influence than those that do not live there,” Walker said.
Commissioner Karen Palmer noted that a light study showed no light fell in homes across the street.
“I don’t accept the findings of the study,” said Walker. “The whole notion that the lights are not an intrusion in the neighborhood…I don’t see that to be accurate. The lights are an intrusion.”
Commissioner Caryn St. Clair voiced concern that University City would be blackballed from receiving future grant money from the Municipal Park Grant Commission of St. Louis County, which partially funded the lights.
In June, University City received a letter from the Park Grant Commission expressing displeasure that the range lights had been disabled, and indicating that University City's decision could jeopardize future grant funding opportunities.
Walker said he received the letter but did not reply.
“They recognize we are reviewing the issue,” he said. “I saw no need to respond to this.”
Walker said the worst-case scenario is the lights remain off. He said at that point University City would return the $39,000 grant money to the Municipal Park Commission.
“We would give that money back, and say we're not using the lights, this was the amount of money from the grant devoted to that, so here is that portion back. And that would not jeopardize our future grant access," Walker said.
Barbara Heise
6:50 am on Thursday, September 29, 2011
I live around the corner from these lights and if they are an intrusion for the 4 homes in question, all UCitians should start complaining about street lights and see if we should turn them off.
Kim
11:40 am on Thursday, September 29, 2011
I had never considered it before, but now that you mention it, there's a rather bright streetlight about 25 feet from my bedroom window. Until now I have assumed that my only recourse was to close the blinds. But hey, maybe a complaint to the city could get it turned off and I would be spared the inconvenience. Perhaps the folks who live along Midland should have the lights at Heman Park shut off too. And, I know it's not in UCity, but last week I attended a game at Gay Field in Clayton and gosh darnit, those actual stadium lights were shining into a row of houses located just yards from the field, with little landscape architecture to speak of - it's a wonder the lights there are still on! Don't those people realize that buying a house adjacent to a sporting venue doesn't necessarily mean that you should actually have to put up with sports being conducted on the premises? Have the city shut it down! Gay Field is awfully close to UCity borders - maybe Mr. Walker could help!
John Clark
8:25 am on Thursday, September 29, 2011
If Mr. Walker is going to reject the study that showed no light spillage which Ms. Palmer brought up, why is he now waiting for a study? What will make this study legitimate in his eyes? I suppose if it comes out in his favor...
Isn't it time to admit that Mr. Walker, the mayor's hand-picked choice to be city manager, has painted himself into a corner with his impulse decision this spring to turn the lights. Every justification I've heard from him has now been shot down thoroughly, except that the neighbors don't like it.
Well, if that's going to be the standard, "that the neighbors don't like it" and not the years of study and public input and money spent, than I've got a few things in my neighborhood I'll tell him that I don't like. Can I get those fixed, too? For instance, several of my neighbors have dogs, and I can often hear them, and even occasionally see them! It's terribly disturbing. Plus, I'm a cat person, but my cats need their space. A few neighbors have their own cats, and that keeps my cats from enjoying the undivided love and attention of ALL the neighborhood kids. Can't we do something about that? And close by, one of my neighbors has a MiniCooper, and I just hated "The Italian Job," and everytime I see the car, I'm reminded of that horrible movie. Can't Mr. Walker make them remove their car from my eyesight? What else is a city manager for, than to cater to the whims of the residents?
Kim
11:25 am on Thursday, September 29, 2011
Mr. Clark - I'm sure it's only a matter of time before Lehman Walker's cronies flag your comment as inappropriate and it is removed. Please be aware that there is a facebook page, UCity on the Record, which reposts many Patch articles related to city affairs. You can share your opinions there and they won't be deleted, (although they might be challenged and debated.)
Christy
2:05 pm on Thursday, September 29, 2011
Hey! I resemble that mini-cooper remark! My cats are better than your cats.
Kim
3:18 pm on Thursday, September 29, 2011
I view Christy's remarks as a personal attack on John Clark's cats. Perhaps she should clarify that it is her OPINION that her cats are better than his.
Cindy Thierry
8:34 am on Thursday, September 29, 2011
My comment was removed so I will repost.
Where does Mr. Walker plan to find the $39,000 to refund the Park Grant Commission? The surplus budget residents were sold is now a deficit budget due to Mr. Walker forgetting to include the almost $700,000 required for the new firehouse. There are also additional city expenditures such as the expanded travel budget for the council and the $100,000 to hire a PR firm adding to the deficit as well.
Mr. Walker states that he did not feel it was necessary to respond to the Park Grant Commission’s letter concerning the driving range lights. Perhaps the Park Grant Commission won’t feel it necessary to respond to future grant requests such as the city’s grant request for a sprinkler system.